Monday, 21 April 2025

Beakstown Castle - a Ryan / Purcell Castle in North Tipp

 

Beakstown Mill

I first came across reference to a Ryan interest in a castle at Beakstown on Wikitree

https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/O'Mulryan-2

I'm not 100% convinced that John O'Mulryan of Beakstown is the same as the John O'Mulryan that was Abbot of Abbeyowney but we will see. 

Hayes's book "Burials in Holycross Abbey" (pg 18) seems to back-up some of the information on Wikitree.

"BURIAL OF OLIVER OGE MORRIS ...... He was married to a daughter of John Mac Conor O'Mulryan who occupied the Purcell Castle in Beakstown, already alluded to. He had a grant of Farney Castle which was built around this period by Ormonde. Colonel Morres also asserts that Sir Oliver Morres, father of Oliver Oge, who died in 1530, was buried in Holycross as well. 

His wife's people, the O'Mulryans, who were tenants of the barons of Loughmore in Beakstown, were probably buried in the Abbey."


However we don't know how trustworthy the source of the information is for this. 

https://thetipperaryantiquarian.blogspot.com/2025/01/hervey-morris-1798-hero-or-genealogical.html

Hayes also says (pg 20) "John Ryan, Coolkill, who died in 1633. He was a tenant of the Barons of Loughmore in Coolkill"

We can confirm there was a castle at Beakstown from the Civil Survey - "Upon the sd lands is one Castle and an ould Stump of a stone house the Castle out of repaire in Beakstowne, and two Mills on the River Shewer in repair." 


One of the mills is likely to be the one photographed above. 

Archaeology.ie has a lot more information on the mill and the former castle. 

Regarding the mill (pictured above) it says "A doorway at the N end of the NW wall incorporates a chamfered jamb from an earlier building, possibly Beakstown Castle." 

Other evidence of the castle includes 

"In 2000 archaeological rescue survey of the spoil heap of the levelled Beakstown House by Paul Stevens recovered 134 dressed stone fragments, including 120 late medieval quoins, a late medieval ogee arch fragment, two corbels, two Tudor chamfered door-jambs and a date stone of 1699 now incorporated into the boundary wall of the property." 

I unfortunately haven't seen this date stone. 

For more detail on this excavation see the following report. 

https://excavations.ie/report/2000/Tipperary/0005780/

It seems to suggest that Beakstown Castle was a tower-house and may have been burned before the stone was eventually reused in the construction of a Georgian style house there. 


In relation to John Ryan of Coolkill we find in Richard Fitzpatrick's thesis on the Ryans of Inch that 

(pg2) "the remainder of the estate consisted of the manor of Coolkill. This represented the old mensal lands of the O’Mulryan clan who once ruled over the territory of Kilnelongurty (later incorporated into the barony of Kilnamanagh Upper). With some exceptions, these lands were made up of coarser upland pasture, but they nevertheless conferred a degree of prestige upon the Ryans of Inch due to their ancestral links to the territory’s historic chief, Shane Glasse O’Mulryan."

(pg73) "On 18 March 1704, a mere seven days before a clause in the ‘Act to prevent the further growth of Popery’ became active and debarred Catholics from purchasing land, Purcell sold his lands in Kilnelongurty (the manor of Coolkill), approximately 2,000 acres, to John Ryan for the princely sum of £1,620 (ten years purchase). Ryan reportedly paid the money to Purcell ‘in hand before the p[er]fection of these presents’, and it is clear that Ryan must have made a lot of money over the preceding years outside the meagre income from his estate.42 The sources of his money were varied, including the period he spent in London, his legal work upon his return to Ireland (section 2) and profits from a trading venture he held an interest in with his brother, Patrick Ryan, which had completed its first known known voyage by the end of 1703 (section 3)."

So there seems to be a link between the Ryans mentioned in Hayes's book and the later Ryan's of Inch. 

What Fitzpatrick seems to say is that the early family of Ryans of Inch filled a vaccum following the purchase of some Ryan lands from Shane Glasse O'Mulryan by the Purcells. The Purcells thus becoming the major power in this area of Kilnelogurty. 

John Ryan of Coolkill pays the Purcells a small rent and the two families are allies. Members of the Ryans of Inch become estate agents / lawyers for the Purcells and deal with legal land issues for the Purcells including repossession of Beakstown Castle following (pg 39) "the King’s re-granting of the estate to Ormond in 1661 as guardian to Nicholas Purcell" 

Fitzpatrick in his thesis seems to say that the castle was still intact in 1665. It doesn't specifically say when the Ryans were actually tenants in it. 

The date stone of 1699 is interesting. Was this maybe referring to the later Georgian House built on site it seems unlikely that they were still building tower-houses at this date?

Saturday, 19 April 2025

Civil Survey Notes - Knockdromin / Incha Beg / Inchamore

 


Knockdromin / Incha Beg / Inchamore

Connor O Bryen of Knockane Esqr.

Donogh mcPhillipp of Insybegg Gent

Teige McKeogh of Knockydromune Gt.

Owny McKeogh of Garrymeregine Gt.

William McKeogh of Ballyda Gent

The HMR have a few possible strands.

There is a Mahoone McTeige and there is also a Mahowne McKeogh. In the Civil Survey we have a Teige McKeogh.

So I would think there is a good possibility that this Mahoone / Mahowne is a son of Teige McKeogh.

There is also an Edmond McWillm, there is a William McKeogh in the Civil Survey so Edmond could possibly be his son and therefore this Edmond is a McKeogh.

There is a Donnogh Byren recorded in the HMR. Could he be the same as the Donogh mcPhillipp of Insybegg. Probably a bit of a stretch.

We are reviewing at least three different townlands and so a name that is recorded in the Civil Survey may not have been as easy to follow down through the records.

An example of this is McKeogh. It is in the Civil Survey for the “united” townlands. Doesn’t appear in the HMR for Inchamore but is in subsequent records such as the Tithe Applotment, Griffiths Valuation and 1901 / 1911 census. (Interestingly there is a Timothy McKeogh in Inchamore in the Tithe Applotments, Timothy / Teige?)

https://thetipperaryantiquarian.blogspot.com/2025/04/hearth-money-rolls-knockadromin-incha.html

Hearth Money Rolls - Knockadromin / Incha Beg / Inchamore

 


In the Hearth Money Rolls 1665

This townland took a bit of figuring out as you can see by the various names it previously had.

The following names were recorded in Knockadromin townland (Queildrumni / Cnocknednimin / Killdromina).

 

Edward

Howell

Daniell

Tuohy

Edmd.

McWillm

Mahowne

Hogane

 

 

 

 

 

Kenedy

Bryen

Mahowne

McKeogh

Owley

Leery

Donnogh

Bryen

 

 

 

 

There is also 1666-7 addon / additional return.

Mahoon

Hogan

Teige

O'Bryan

Edward

Howell

Mahoone

McTeige

Donnogh

O'Bryan

 

Generally the first name in a townland seems to be the most important landowner. At least that is my impression so far.

In this townland this rule doesn’t seem to hold true. Edward Howell is listed first in 1665 but 3rd in the 1666-67 return. Mahowne Hogan is listed last in 1665 and 1st in 1666-67.

Donnogh O’Brien is also listed in both returns. Howell is likely to be an English settler surname. Edmund McWilliam is an unusual name, where he is likely to be from I’m not sure. The rest seem to be of Gaelic origin with Tuohy, McKeogh, O’Leary & McTeige (linked to being the descendant of someone living nearby, for example Teige O’Brien). 

The next available "Census" for the area is the Tithe Appointment Books 1824.

https://titheapplotmentbooks.nationalarchives.ie/search/tab/results.jsp?county=Tipperary&parish=Templeachally&townland=Knockadromin&search=Search

O’Brien / Brien is the only surname that continues from the Hearth Money Rolls.

In the Griffiths Valuation (see picture) the name Brien continues.



 

In the 1901 census

https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1901/Tipperary/Ballina/Knockadromin/

The name Tuohy reappears in this return but he is a Cattle Dealer staying at Hayes’s home. O’Brien is no longer recorded.

In 1911,

 

https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1911/Tipperary/Ballina/Knockadromin/

No names from the Hearth Money Rolls remain by 1911.

My own analysis of the rolls highlighting the Arra records.

https://thetipperaryantiquarian.blogspot.com/2024/04/the-hearth-money-rolls-in-half-barony.html?




In the Hearth Money Rolls 1665
The following names were recorded in Inchabeg townland (Inchibegg).

Dermtt.

Halloren

Owen

McDaniell

 

Generally the first name in a townland seems to be the most important landowner. At least that is my impression so far.

Only two names and both seem of Gaelic origin.

The next available "Census" for the area is the Tithe Appointment Books 1824 but I don’t have access to it for this townland if it exists. 

In the later Griffiths valuation (pictured), the Hearth Rolls surnames do not appear.  



In the 1901 census

https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1901/Tipperary/Ballina/Incha_Beg/

& 1911 none of the Hearth names reappear.


https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1901/Tipperary/Ballina/Incha_Beg/

 

These last few townlands show that it is not a given that surnames continue down through the records.

 

My own analysis of the rolls highlighting the Arra records.
https://thetipperaryantiquarian.blogspot.com/2024/04/the-hearth-money-rolls-in-half-barony.html? 



In the Hearth Money Rolls 1665
The following names were recorded in Inchamore townland (Inchamore).


John      Hicky

Connor O'Mallowny

Owen    Ryane

James   Hicky

Connor Malloony

Danniell Hicky

Donnogh Fenagh

Generally the first name in a townland seems to be the most important landowner. At least that is my impression so far.

This seems to remain a very Gaelic townland with Hickeys, Moloneys, Ryans and the last name Fenagh (I’m not sure of the origin / what that name would be today)?.

What is very interesting about this record is that it seems to record the occupation of one of those recorded.

Connor Malloony is recorded as a Brogmaker or shoemaker. Other than those that own a Kiln or Oven this is the only occupation that can be determined from the records.

The next available "Census" for the area is the Tithe Appointment Books 1824.

https://titheapplotmentbooks.nationalarchives.ie/search/tab/results.jsp?county=Tipperary&parish=Templeachally&townland=Inchamore&search=Search

In this we have Hickey and Ryans.

In the later Griffiths valuation (pictured), these two names from the Hearth Money Roll names are represented.








In the 1901 census

https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1901/Tipperary/Ballina/Incha_More/

Hickeys and Ryans remain.


In 1911


https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1911/Tipperary/Ballina/Incha_More/

Hickeys and Ryans are still there. Although both common names in the wider area. Ryan in particular is less common in the half-barony of Arra and so both are certainly worth further study to see if they have links to the Hearth Money Rolls.

 

My own analysis of the rolls highlighting the Arra records.
https://thetipperaryantiquarian.blogspot.com/2024/04/the-hearth-money-rolls-in-half-barony.html?

 

Civil Survey Notes - Roran

 

Rorane

The following is recorded in the Civil Survey

John Roch of Killnacranagh Gent

Dermott O Bryen of Gortmore, Gent

Both of these purchased their share of the lands. One from Teige mc. Therlagh Duffe and the other from Donnogh Grany O Byren.

Both of these two landowners I think have been conclusively located in the Hearth Money Rolls (both we scheduled to be transplanted but both managed to remain around.) Interestingly both are located in Gortmore.

Could this holding at Rorane have been what binded them?

In the HMR for Roran there is also a Dermot Byren. If he wasn’t already located in Gortmore you would probably try to suggest it could be him. There is also a Donnogh O’Birne. Could he be Donnogh Grany O Bryen mentioned as the former owner?

An O’Brien appears in the Griffiths Valuation leasing over 200 acres which would be fairly substantial at the time.

However there are no O’Briens in the 1901 or 1911 census in the townland.

https://thetipperaryantiquarian.blogspot.com/2025/04/hearth-money-rolls-roran.html



Hearth Money Rolls - Roran

 


In the Hearth Money Rolls 1665

The following names were recorded in Roran townland (Roran).

Dermott

Bryen

Daniell

Malloony

Donnogh

O'Birne

John

Bawne

 

 

 

There is also 1666-7 addon / additional return.

John

Bane

Donnogh

O'Biren

Daniell

O'Mulloony

Daniell

McTeige

 

Generally the first name in a townland seems to be the most important landowner. At least that is my impression so far.

In this townland this rule doesn’t seem to hold exactly true. John Bawne is listed last in the first list and first in the 2nd list.

Bawn, Moloney & Byrne are common to both lists along with O’Brien and McTeige. . McTeige could be the descendant of another name in the townland or nearby eg Teige O’Brien.

All the surnames appear to be of Gaelic origin. The only one I wouldn’t be certain of is Bawn. This may relate to a nickname around the colour Bán or could it be anything to do with Brian Bán the MacIBrien potentiator.

 

The next available "Census" for the area is the Tithe Appointment Books 1824.

https://titheapplotmentbooks.nationalarchives.ie/search/tab/results.jsp?county=Tipperary&parish=Templeachally&townland=Semplecally&search=Search

There are only three surnames recorded, intriguingly one of them is White, could he be anything to John Bawn in the 1660s ?

In the Griffiths Valuation (see picture) O’Brien features from the Hearth Money Rolls but White doesn’t.


In the 1901 census

https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1901/Tipperary/Ballina/Roran/

In 1911,

https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1911/Tipperary/Ballina/Roran/

No names from the Hearth Money Rolls reappear in 1901 / 1911 and there is no sign of O’Briens or White that was recorded in the Tithe Appointments.

 

My own analysis of the rolls highlighting the Arra records.

https://thetipperaryantiquarian.blogspot.com/2024/04/the-hearth-money-rolls-in-half-barony.html?

Friday, 18 April 2025

Civil Survey Notes - Ballymalone (Beg & Upper)

 


Ballymalone (Beg & More)

The following are recorded in the Civil Survey in Ballymolloony

Donogh O Bryen of Ballyea Gent

Thomas Arthur of Limicke Doctor in Phissige Esqr.

Teige mc.Donogh of Killoghy Gent

Theige O Bryen of Killmcstully Gt.

Connor O Duricke of Ballymolloony

Morish Hicky of Ballymolloony phisitian

Daniell oge O Hicky of the same phisitian

all Irish Papists

This record presents some fascinating insights. Thomas Arthur was a famous Doctor (of todays Arthurs Quay) and also whose fee book antiquarian Maurice Lenihan owned is listed as a landowner here.

https://www.dib.ie/biography/arthur-thomas-a0234

According to the Civil Survey his portion from Daniel O’Brien Esqr. We also see two Hickys / Hickeys – both phisitians (a type of Doctor I assume). This maybe how Arthur became linked to the area through contacts in the medical profession? Also it is likely that these Hickeys are descendants of the famous medical family who provided medical services to the O’Briens.

A John / James Hickie – again a medical doctor was buried in Templeachally graveyard with the following inscription recorded by Maurice Lenihan.

“Anno R.J.H

1648

Monumentum Hoc

Sibi Carissimae

Uxori

Et posteris fieri

Fecit clarissimus

DD Joannes Hickey

Medicinae

doctor Peritissimus”

How this townland is then named the Townland of the Moloneys / Malones I don’t quite understand. Perhaps it was a kind of shared land for some of the families that served the O’Briens and the Moloney clan carried out some of these skilled tasks but by this stage maybe the Hickeys and Duracks happened to be in possession?  

Also on logainm - an old name for the townland seems to be Moynahan.

https://www.logainm.ie/en/46176

This brings to mind the Moynahan name that features at Ballycarridoge, was there some kind of link?

https://thetipperaryantiquarian.blogspot.com/2025/03/civil-survey-notes-ballycaridoge.html

Unfortunately it seems more likely that there was no connection between the surnames / placename.  

Next we look at were any of those recorded in the Civil Survey still there in the Hearth Money Rolls?

In the HMR there is a Hugh Hickey, possibly a relative of the two Hickey Doctors?

There is Roger and a Dermott McTeige? Could they be sons of Theige O’Brien of Killmacstully. (The same Teige that was listed for transplantation in Kilmastulla?)

There are also two Duricks – Rory & Donnogh. They are likely to be related to the Connor listed in the Civil Survey.

Lastly Mahowne McDaniell could be a son of Daniel Og O’ Hickey or even the Daniel O’Brien Esqr that sold out to Thomas Arthur.

Duricks and Moloneys are prominent in later records (which makes it even stranger that there were no Moloney landowners here in the Civil Survey). Hickeys and O’Briens don’t carry through in the townland.

https://thetipperaryantiquarian.blogspot.com/2025/04/hearth-money-rolls-ballymalone-beg-more.html


Hearth Money Rolls - Ballymalone (Beg & More)

 

In the Hearth Money Rolls 1665
The following names were recorded in Ballymalone (Beg & More) townland (Ballymallooery Vill).

Hugh

Hicky

Roger

McTeige

Rory

Durick

Connor

McShane

Morrogh

Mullooney

Donnogh

Durick

Mahowne

McDaniell

Dermott

McTeige

James

Shamrogg


There doesn’t seem to be a 1666-7 addon / additional return.

Generally the first name in a townland seems to be the most important landowner. At least that is my impression so far. So interesting rather than a Malone it is a Hickey that is listed first.

Hugh Hicky is the first name listed in the townland and would have been Gaelic Irish. There are two Duricks in the townland, Rory & Donnogh.

There is a Morrogh Mullooney and he may be the “Malone” in the townland. Maloney / Moloney & Malone I think are likely to have been recorded in various similar forms in the half-barony.

Roger McTeige, Conor McShane, Mahowne McDanniell & Dermott McTeige are all likely to Gaelic Irish and carry another surname eg Roger McTeige Hicky or Mullooney.

One of my favourite surnames in the Hearth Rolls is James Shamrogg. Rather than being linked to the the Irish symbol the Shamrock. It may in fact be an English name - https://www.libraryireland.com/names/s/seamrog.php


The next available "Census" for the area is the Tithe Appointment Books 1824. However I couldn’t find the Ballymalone townland in it.

In the later Griffiths valuation there is a large number of names recorded between Beg & More.











There are a large number of Moloneys and some Duricks but no Hickeys remain in the townland. No Shamroggs either.

 

Many of the names from the Griffiths valuation carry on to the 1901 census

https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1901/Tipperary/Ballina/Ballymalone_More/

https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1901/Tipperary/Ballina/Ballymalone_Beg/


And again in 1911
https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1911/Tipperary/Ballina/Ballymalone_More/

https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1911/Tipperary/Ballina/Ballymalone_Beg/


My own analysis of the rolls highlighting the Arra records.
https://thetipperaryantiquarian.blogspot.com/2024/04/the-hearth-money-rolls-in-half-barony.html?

Thursday, 17 April 2025

Civil Survey Notes - Kilmastulla

 

Kilmastulla

In the Civil Survey the following are recorded 

Barnaby Earle of Thomond English Protestant

Teige Bryen of Kilmcstully Gt

John Roch of Cranagh

In The Irish landed gentry when Cromwell came to Ireland by O’Hart a Teige Bryen of Kilmuctully is listed for transplantation to Connacht. 

There is no record of him in the Hearth Money Rolls for the townland and we don’t know where he was supposed to obtain land in Connacht so we don’t know what happened to him. 

The next available record is the Tithe Applotment Books and there are a number of O’Briens recorded in that. 

However the surname does not carry on in the townland into the later records. See here for further analysis.

https://thetipperaryantiquarian.blogspot.com/2025/04/hearth-money-rolls-kilmastulla.html


Hearth Money Rolls - Kilmastulla

 


In the Hearth Money Rolls 1665
The following names were recorded in Kilmastulla townland (Kilmastully / Killmcstulla).

John

Godfrey

John

Lee

Thomas

Woodmansey

John

O'Malloony

Bernaby

Rawlens

Edward

Hayes

John

O'Durick

Dermtt.

O'Durick

Morrogh

Mulloony

Teige

O'Tiffy

Connor

O'Hogane

Rory

Minoge

Patrick

Gillam

 

 

 

There is also an additional or add-on for 1666-67

John

Godfrey

John

Lee

John

Malloony

Rory

O'Sullevane

Teige

Ryan

Daniell

McHugh

John

O'Duricke

Derm.

O'Duricke

Morogh

O'Maloony

Teige

Teifey

Patrick

Gillman

Connor

Hogan

Rory

Minoge

John

McHugh

Dinish

Hogan

John

Roghane

Teige

McHugh

 

Generally the first name in a townland seems to be the most important landowner. At least that is my impression.

A number of people are common to both lists

John Godfrey, John Lee, John Moloney, John & Dermot Durrick, Teige Teifey, Conor Hogan, Morrough Moloney, Patrick Gillman / Gillam, Rory Minogue.

I think that John Godfrey and John Lee would have been English settlers in the area. Similarly, Thomas Woodmansey, Bernaby Rawlins and possibly Patrick Gillman / Gillam.

Although there is a large number of possible newcomers, there are also a long list of Gaelic surnames that remain in the townland, Moloney, Hayes, Durick, Teifey, Hogan, Minogue, O’Sullivan, Ryan, Roghan and likely McHugh as well.

The next available "Census" for the area is the Tithe Appointment Books 1824 – unusually there are 209 entries in Kilmastulla for this.

Names that carry through from the Hearth Money Rolls are Hogan, Ryan, Moloney and interestingly from a rarity point of view Teifey (Tecfy) and Roughan (Roghane, Rojan).

 
https://titheapplotmentbooks.nationalarchives.ie/search/tab/results.jsp?surname=&firstname=&county=Tipperary&townland=Kilmastulla&parish=Kilmastulla&search=Search&sort=&pageSize=&pager.offset=0


In the later Griffiths valuation – there are only 26 entries. It is hard to believe a drop from 209 to 26 in this period. Unless it was taken after the famine in this townland? However, I’d fairly sure Griffiths was pre famine.

Of the surnames only Hogan and Ryan hold through.


The 1901 Census

https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1901/Tipperary/Birdhill/Kilmastulla/

The 1911 Census. 
https://www.census.nationalarchives.ie/pages/1911/Tipperary/Birohill/Kilmastulla/

It is only Ryan that has carried on from the Hearth Money Rolls, could some of these Ryans be descended from Teige Ryan?

My own analysis of the rolls highlighting the Arra records.
https://thetipperaryantiquarian.blogspot.com/2024/04/the-hearth-money-rolls-in-half-barony.html?

 

Tuesday, 15 April 2025

Was there an even bigger circle in Lough Gur?

Mythical Ireland recently had a post about Ireland's "Stonehenge", a very impressive site that was destroyed in Co. Louth in the townland of Carnbeg. It got me thinking again about the missing stone circle at Lough Gur in Co. Limerick and I had another look at some of the the evidence for it. I had initially thought it was just north of Grange B (the large circle that most people would be familiar with at Lough Gur) from an old 1840s Ordnance Survey Map. (See below)

Grange D stone circle to the North of Grange B stone circle (still intact) © NMS

However from chatting to Tim Fitzgerald a number of years ago (the owner of the land on which Grange B is located) he indicated that there was a large crop mark in a field to the north-west of the circle (across the road). This is marked in the SMR as an embanked enclosure and you can see from some of the aerial photographs attached that it stands out pretty clearly.

Highlighted embanked circle © NMS

 

 

Highlighted embanked circle © Microsoft

In "On Certain Megalithic Remains Immediately Surrounding Lough Gur, County Limerick by Bertram C. A. Windle 1912 / 1913" - Windle goes into some detail about this missing circle known as Grange D. In the survey there is some confusion between whether the missing circle was to the north west or north of Grange C (and whether it was on the same side of the road or across the road from it). Are there in fact two large missing circles?

In the above Windle states "Professor Harkness says (p. 389): "A short distance northwards from this fine circle [i.e. circle ' B '] the remains of another are seen. This second one is entirely composed of blocks of stone. An old road runs through the western side of this second circle; the portions which remain are, however, sufficient to afford a knowledge of its original size. Its diameter is larger than the fine stone and earth circle at Grange Cottage, being 170 feet." Mr. Lynch says (p. 300): "About 30 yards north of the chief circle there is another circle with a diameter of 170 feet. It has no rath, and only six pillar stones are left. In Fitzgerald's time there were seventy-two stones in this circle, but about sixty-five years ago it was destroyed by Mr. Edward Croker, of Grange'. Finally Mr. Lewis (p. 524), who mentions the same facts as have just been alluded to, seems to have missed the remains which still exist, for he says : "It is said to have possessed seventy-two stones in 1826, but only sixty in 1828, and of these all but six were destroyed in 1830; if any of those six are left now, they are probably built into some of the stone fences, for I did not see them."

Windle goes on to say that there may be an issue with fitting Grange D beside Grange B. "From the segment which remains, Professor Alexander has been able to compute the diameter which the entire circle, if it were a circle, possessed, and this would have been 225 feet. Now, if a circle of this diameter were to be described on the plan, it would intersect circle C. Either, then, this was no part of a circle, or the stones have been so much disturbed as to make it impossible to draw any deductions respecting them."

So it seems that there were some stones remaining in 1830 and by tracing these (if they were a circle) they would run through Circle C (which still exists today). However I’ve tried this on google maps and if you take the diameter of the circle as being 170ft (as per Lynch above) it actually shows that the old 1840s OS map is to scale and a circle (with its western edge missing) would fit between Circle C and the field boundary.

Grange Circle D fitting between Circle C and boundary / old road if 175ft diameter © Google

Professor Alexander gives a diameter of 225ft based on remains when he inspected. However again using google maps I think a circle of this size could have fitted beside Circle C (see the mock up below). 

Grange Circle D fitting between Circle C and running through boundary / old road if 225ft diameter © Google

What is missing though is any crop mark for the circle. However as it states above it was “entirely composed of blocks of stone”, so I’m guessing that a stone only circle (without a bank) would have left a much fainter crop circle than an embanked circle? 

So the question remains, would it have been possible for a circle of 170ft diameter and between 72 and 60 stones to have existed to the north of Circle C? For comparison purposes Grange B is approx 153ft in diameter. From the google maps evidence it appears that yes it could have.

Mock up of possible Grange D stone circle beside Grange C

Another option is that the missing Circle existed 'across the road' where the crop marks exist today. There are some stones in this field and in Windle's survey they are described as an "Avenue". How they would relate to a potential stone circle I'm not sure - I've included a picture of some the stones from the avenue and the area of the field where the crop circle is (see below). This circle looks to be more of an oval rather than a circle and from google maps measures 326ft at its longer width and 243ft at its narrower width.

Some of the stones of the "Avenue" and the area of the field where the embanked stone circle would be.

In Windle he says of the Avenue “Harkness thought that they might have formed the western side of circle D but this is clearly impossible. Mr. Lynch thinks that it was the avenue leading to a completely destroyed circle in the same field. Harkness (p. 390), in his description, alludes to "a large cup-shaped depression about 210 paces in diameter ; but whether this is a natural or an artificial production there is not sufficient evidence at present to determine." Mr. Lynch also alludes (p. 300) to this depression, which he says has a diameter of 230 feet. He adds: "Not a stone is now left of this circle, the last having been taken away about sixty years ago. There are traces of this circle having been formerly surrounded by a rath." There certainly is a cup-shaped depression in the field ; but I think it better to agree with Professor Harkness that there is not sufficient evidence to say what it may have been, or indeed to decide upon its natural or artificial origin.”

Mock-up of what the embanked stone circle "might" have looked like - a lot of speculation here on my part!

So to conclude is the existing Grange B only the “baby” of two much larger monuments? Namely a 72 upright stone circle without a bank with a diameter of probably 170ft called Grange D and an unnamed embanked oval of 326ft? More detailed surveying of the area at Grange D would certainly go a long way to help figuring it out. 

Thanks to Microsoft & National Monuments of Ireland for use of their aerial photographs respectively.